Strengths and weaknesses of quantitative research

Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research

Mixed methods research begins. of quantitative and qualitative data maximizes the strengths and minimizes the weaknesses of.Ragin (1989), however, maintained that the comparative approach is a distinctive field because it can be characterised as having an undeviating experiential functioning of the nonfigurative notion of society that has a high level of notions.Our Marking Service will help you pick out the areas of your work that need improvement.Anything that exists and can be thought about has the potential to be compared.Virtually it is impossible for comparison not to exist, since it is a major part of human nature.

PPT – Qualitative Field Research PowerPoint presentation

As discussed throughout the essay when these approaches are applied in mainstream social science or in comparative social science they are some advantages and disadvantages which can occur.

The first step he insinuated occurred during the 19th century and was established by Marc- Antonie Jullien the first known methodically, academic comparative educationalist.However, when the comparative approach is applied in education it may be defined as being a combination of pedagogy and the social sciences.They opine that effort ought to be present in order to become cognisant of such partialities and furthermore to enquiry individual postulations although attempting to comprehend the postulations fundamental to the nations and traditions which are aims of investigations.Therefore, in this essay I will be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative comparative approaches.Secondly, some individuals are of the opinion that the means by which the data is measured false belief that it is exactitude.

For example, quantitative research allows a researcher to objectively detail evidence.Researchers of the qualitative comparative approach also are condemned because they tend to be concerned with hypothesises which are unrelated to cases being examined, therefore this results in findings which are not truly linked to the instigative enquiries.What are the fundamental elements of good quantitative and qualitative research.

The comparative approach in education deals with the structure and purpose a school serves.The use of the quantitative comparative approach is advantageous obviously for the same reasons mentioned for the use of the quantitative approach in mainstream social science, however Ragin (1989) has presented seven advantages that compartivists derive when they apply the quantitative comparative approach.Qualitative research is collection of research methods that collect verbal or text data in order to answer sociological questions.The main purpose of the comparative approach in this field of study is to construct a justification of worldwide trends that are common to these societies but also allows researchers to analyse the more intricate trends of a society Ragain (1987).Table 2 below summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of...However, they are four major disadvantages which can be associated with the application of the qualitative approach in mainstream social science.

And furthermore diverse investigative methods assist in achieving diverse means of investigating the same research project.Objectivity Qualitative research tends to cause a researcher to become immersed in the research topic.Furthermore, the other reason for this merger between fields is the noticeable interest in quantitative and experiential and approaches of investigation (Noah and Eckstein 1969).They are also some disadvantages in applying the qualitative comparative approach.Thirdly, it allows investigators to consider alternative explanations more carefully when testing a theory.Qualitative research instruments pdf. in.Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantitative.Fourthly and finally it supports enhanced global comprehending and collaboration owing to augmented understanding to various beliefs and traditions of the world.An investigation that merges both the quantitative and qualitative approaches presents a procedural basis for opposing apparent innate assumptions.Typically contrasts are advanced by of the direction of assumptions.

What is Mixed Methods Research?

Lincoln (1995) stated that this approach is procedure has a large concern of integrating and deducing the real subject with an effort to explain and understand trends of people.The strengths and weaknesses of qualitative and quantitative research are a perennial, hot debate.In the broad field of sociology the comparative approach may be defined as relating to a type of evaluation that contrasts one ideology or investigative plan aligned with others.Among the specific strengths of using qualitative methods to.Memos can describe and define concepts, deal with methodological issues, or offer initial theoretical formulations.

The advantages and disadvantages of qualitative research are as follows.An example of how the quantitative approach was applied in mainstream social science was the study conducted by Chin, Fisak and Sims (2002).Compartivits can either apply this approach qualitatively or quantitatively, although the qualitative approach is mostly used it is being applied to the comparative approach.Thirdly, these researchers should seek to gather their pertinent information that will answer their research questions.Thirdly, sometimes, the respondents may not have enough knowledge to answer the questionnaire adequately, which will result in the data not reflecting the current trend.When compartivists apply this method it has three major steps these are: - the dual employment of the indirect method of difference and the step which is related to the elimination of challenging single elements of clarification through opposite comparisons.

This revamping of the field prompted researchers to inculcate the quantitative procedures from the conventional social sciences, which led to the application of the social science procedures to analyse hypotheses.Concurrently, there are feasible assumptions, systems, and strategies across the globe, and an aspiration to get worldwide explanations to worldwide phenomena.It may have a possibility of being replaced by another one that can be used to explicate the same others that would explain the same common trend (Gerring 2008).

The final method that Mill (1888) defined, that the comparative approach is grounded on, is the indirect method of agreement.Green, A., Preston. J and J,G. 2006.Janmaat. Education, equality and social cohesion.As a result of the desire to explicate these cases, frequently may result in additional research which extends beyond the initial subjects.At this point the researcher has to redefine the research question, gather more information and re-interrupt the gathered information.Qualitative Studies In general terms, quantitative research methods involve. touch on the strengths and weaknesses research.

1.3 Quantitative Research.pdf - DME for Peace